<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New searches, New SEO guidelines?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techitlikeaman.com/2006/12/29/new-searches-new-seo-guidelines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techitlikeaman.com/2006/12/29/new-searches-new-seo-guidelines/</link>
	<description>Bulletz of Knowledge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 07:37:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Pack</title>
		<link>http://techitlikeaman.com/2006/12/29/new-searches-new-seo-guidelines/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Pack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.bucketobulletz.com/2006/12/29/new-searches-new-seo-guidelines/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>the unanswered questions you talk about, are always of concern, but we at Sproose have put great thought in to this and have deployed systems to keep users from gaming the index. We won&#039;t say what they are..obvious. SEO for sproose is still possible just to be in the original ranking index, but our opinion of SEO is that why should sites have to pay someone to artificially inflate the link popularity to gain hierarchy?? There&#039;s more false indexing in the current search engines.

Sproose/ CEO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the unanswered questions you talk about, are always of concern, but we at Sproose have put great thought in to this and have deployed systems to keep users from gaming the index. We won&#8217;t say what they are..obvious. SEO for sproose is still possible just to be in the original ranking index, but our opinion of SEO is that why should sites have to pay someone to artificially inflate the link popularity to gain hierarchy?? There&#8217;s more false indexing in the current search engines.</p>
<p>Sproose/ CEO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

